Why Rambo: First Blood Is Still The Best Movie About The Consequences Of War

  • Post author:
Why Rambo: First Blood Is Still The Best Movie About The Consequences Of War
“Rambo. “First blood” is the first film of a long and successful franchise, but it works perfectly as a separate masterpiece about the consequences of war. In one of his most scandalous roles, Sylvester Stallone plays Vietnam War veteran John James Rambo, a former “green beret” of the American army, who now had to wander aimlessly around the country he was defending. Rambo is the definition of an army from one person. As more and more dangerous people join the search forces against him, the veteran resorts to all kinds of desperate measures and partisan tactics to find a way to retreat.
Why Rambo: First Blood Is Still The Best Movie About The Consequences Of War

Rambo: First Blood Is a Masterpiece About the Human Cost of War

One could argue that First Blood is a flawless war film, despite having so few scenes that actually depict war. In fact, the war scenes in the film consist of quick flashbacks that don’t even take up a total of five minutes of the film’s duration. Although the threat of war is not physically present when guns fire, soldiers scream and armies fight, echoes of the battlefield are present in every frame of First Blood. To see this, just look at Rambo’s face. The final moments of First Blood are the pinnacle of any film about the aftermath of war.
Why Rambo: First Blood Is Still The Best Movie About The Consequences Of War
Rambo is a former Green Beret and has received all sorts of medals and certificates for his military service, but none of it makes up for the atrocities he witnessed. It is terribly difficult to watch how he finally breaks down and pours out all the hopelessness that has gripped him to Colonel Trautman. What makes this scene so devastating is how isolated it is from the rest of the film and how brutally it shows that everything Rambo did was in vain, whether in the Vietnamese jungle or in the small town of Hope, Washington.

How the Rambo Franchise Lost its Meaning After the First Movie

“First Blood” viewers finally understand the purpose of all the destruction caused by Rambo. What the devoted audience considers a relevant post-war symbol of despair, the big studios consider it a golden vein. It cannot be denied that “First Blood” can be seen as a well-made action movie at first glance, but it is unacceptable to ignore the shocking blow. And against what Rambo fights in “First blood”, ask? Not the Viet Cong, not the police or “bad guys” – he fights on his own. Other films of the franchise try with all their might to ignore the emotional losses of the war and involve Rambo in all sorts of battles using various weapons and the like.

RELATED:

Making Of Famous Action Movie Rambo ” First Blood 2″

“First blood” gives an exact image of post-traumatic stress disorder, bringing the internal battle of Rambo to the jungle. It consists of a film about the war in Vietnam and its aftermath; mainly because Rambo brings the war with him; he is the only one who can see what is on his mind, but he embodies his incessant search for glory in the means of destruction. There is a reason why “First Blood” did not need a real war to be a war film, but other films of the franchise prefer to embody Rambo’s thirst for destruction, as well as the character himself, quickly turning into a satire, too close to the topic. directed to satirize.